At the end of the last post I admitted that Ponting deserves the title of “Player of the decade” if only we go by the records as a player and nothing else. But I also pointed out that personally I wouldn’t have gone for Ponting. Here’s why:
For a batsman of such class, he’s really struggled against certain bowlers – Harbhajan, Ishant Sharma and Kemar Roach are 3 top of the mind recalls. You can argue that Lara in bad form struggled against anyone who rolled his arm over but that’s only when he is not in form. Except for Mcgrath (that too to a limited extent) no particular bowler has really given Lara nightmares otherwise. But with Ponting you tend to witness that too often even when he is in form. Admittedly Ishant bowled a great spell in Perth but Ponting was absolutely clueless for such a sustained period and he was not going through a bad phase either. Even in the recent series against WI, Kemar Roach had his number all series. More than the dismissals against these bowlers, it’s the ungainly manner in which he played them through fairly long spells which puzzles me. Christian Ryan wrote of Ponting as the man who laughs at the bowlers’ faces (an expression initially used for Bradman!) but there have been enough bowlers who have more than reciprocated that laugh.
Another dark spot in his CV is his record in India. The irony is that he has a fairly good technique against spinners, uses his feet beautifully, handled Murali in Srilanka quite well but somehow comes a cropper in India. Out of his 15 innings in India this decade, his 3rd highest score is 24! An average of 21.85 in 8 matches is rather poor. That he finally scored a hundred in India was more due to a flat track in B’lore where even Zaheer Khan looked all at ease in saving the match than his overcoming of testing conditions. It seems like he suffers a brain freeze when playing in India – invents new ways of getting out. In the 2001 series, he looked like getting out off almost every delivery he faced. Against the most improved team of the decade which has given Australia many a close fight and in arguably the most testing place for a batsman, Ponting is yet to prove himself. True, one blot doesn’t make him undeserving of all the accolades he gets but did we acknowledge Dravid as an all time great till he overcame his demons in Australia?
Now let’s come to his captaincy – it’s a weird mix. He has been the most successful captain in the history of the game in tests and won two back to back ODI world cups too. He might have played his part in claiming the final frontier but it was under Gilchrist that Australia won both the matches at B’lore and Nagpur – so let’s leave that out of the picture. What about the 2 Ashes loss, his detractors might ask. I am not even getting there. Anyone who saw him in India in 2008 would vouch for the fact that his captaincy is rather ordinary, way too defensive and sometimes just incomprehensible – like bowling part timers to play within the spirit of the game when he had a chance to take the fight to India in Nagpur was hilarious. For a guy who spends an eternity between deliveries discussing with his bowlers, he could have found a million ways to play within the spirit of the game (i.e., assuming he actually cares about it!) than have part-timers bowling when the opposition is in a spot of bother! Just recollect any instance where an opponent looked like getting on top of Australia in the past, the next visual you can imagine is Ricky Ponting spreading the field and till as recently as last month he didn't really know that you can declare with less than a record target to chase in tests! So surely his captaincy shouldn’t have added any weight to his choice as player of the decade, if anything it should have had an adverse impact.
Now to my personal choice. Like I mentioned in my previous post, I would have gone for one of Dravid, Mcgrath or Gilchrist.
Glenn Mcgrath
Of course much of his career was in the 90’s but he was as good as ever in the noughties too. In a decade where 55 became the new 50 for batsmen, McGrath not only held his own but even improved on his record from the previous decade. He proved that a great fast bowler is capable of taking wickets in any conditions, situation and format. He was by far the most penetrative fast bowler in the sub-continent and delivered on big matches like only he can. For all the hype about Warne, its Mcgrath who helped Australia sustain their dominance for as long as they did. Against the two best batsmen of his generation, he held his own – infact some would argue he even got the better of one of them by a whisker. His stepping on that innocuous cherry in practice meant an Ashes loss for his country – that’s how critical he was to Australia’s success. His dismissal of Jacques Kallis in the 2007 WC was a masterful display of cunning bowling. But what takes the cake is his dismissal of Sachin Tendulkar in Kolkata in 2001. I have not seen anyone work out Sachin the way he did in that innings. Take a bow guys…arguably the most underrated of the all time great fast bowlers, finished off his test career with a 5-0 Ashes victory and ODI career with a man of the tournament capping WC victory.
Interestingly he seems to have been Sambit Bal’s pick too as he reveals in his blog.
Adam Gilchrist
Gilchrist changed the role of a wicketkeeper forever…I also believe he was Australia’s "go to" man in all almost all crunch situations and guess what, he invariably delivered. As a stand alone batsman he was nearly as great as any other modern great and as a wicket keeper, till the last season of his career, he was the best amongst the contemporaries too. He played some of the finest counter attacking innings in crisis by an Australian ever. He was equally deadly and effective in ODI cricket too with so many swashbuckling innings under his belt but none better than that masterpiece in the final of the 2007 WC – there is not a more definitive ODI innings ever. More than all that, Glichrist like Rhodes changed the way his community is meant to function forever. And that alone is reason enough to award him the player of the decade.
Rahul Dravid
It’s often said that Dravid in a Sachin obsessed country doesn’t get his due. Dravid went through a rather extended bad phase for a couple of seasosns towards the end of the decade after cruising through in top gear for more than 5 years in a row then. During that entire phase, not one prominent headline was there in a media known for hype over substance asking for Dravid’s head. We have even heard “Sachin should retire” or “Sachin should be rested” or “Endulkar?” slogans when he was going through a bad phase in the middle of the decade. But with Dravid we all knew, it was just a matter of time and if its not to be, then of all people he knows best when its time to call it quits. The fact that we have treated him with such maturity is proof enough that this man has got his rightful place in the hearts of cricket aficionados. This kind of matured adulation is not for no reason though. Has there been a batsman as critical to the success of a team ever as Dravid has been to India in this decade? Kolkata, Headingley, Adelaide, Rawalpindi, Perth, Jamaica – Dravid shone in so many of Indian cricket’s defining moments. Also in my opinion, he was India's best captain too. His cricketing acumen was impeccable, always game to take the gamble of a fifth bowler against an extra batsman, nurtured Dhoni into what he is today, brought greater flexibility and adaptiveness to the team. Has a series victory in WI and England under his belt in addition to the most number of consecutive successful run chases in ODI’s. Not to forget that he was the first victorious Indian Captain in Pakistan and South Africa. If a CV with so much to boast about is not fit for “Player of the decade”, then nothing is.
Saturday, January 16, 2010
Friday, January 15, 2010
Of Ponting and Player of the decade…
That Ponting was the best batsman of the decade is not even debatable, it’s obvious. That he went onto become the most successful captain ever was destiny. He produced one of the finest innings played in ODI cricket in the final of the 2003 WC and one of the finest back to the wall fighting innings in the 2005 Ashes too. He only enhanced his reputation as one of the greatest all round fielders in the last decade. So, clearly he seemed to be the overwhelming favorite (despite losing two ashes as a captain) considering all that he has achieved in the last 10 years. But here is the thing – Is a player of the decade merely the possessor of the best record during that time period? Isn’t it meant to be more than churning out runs and taking a heap of wickets? Isn’t he meant to redefine certain aspects of the game or to tower above the rest in projecting the game in its best lights, be a great custodian of the game? If assuming McEnroe had as good a record or even slightly a better record than Federer, would he be rated as the greatest of all time ahead of Federer - I am not so sure. Well, I think he won’t be.
If those extra factors count, then Ponting has fallen way too short of deserving this title. Anyone with the slightest of sense of diplomacy would have done a much better job of damage control during the Sydneygate episode – the street fighter in him came to the fore during that whole affair. He just didn’t get what was wrong with the whole issue. That claiming of a bumped catch against Dhoni in the same series from someone who was persuading all the teams around the world to agree to take the fielders’ word for close catches was either dumb or cheap. His behavior at the press conference that day was imperialistic. His barking at Srinath who was apologizing for hurting him with a bouncer in a test match is a shot from pre-civilized world. His pointing the bat and accusing of Duncan Fletcher after he was run out by a substitute in the Ashes was rather amusing. His barbs at calling Lara selfish after he scored 400 to snatch the record back from Hayden were ungracious. His gesture to Sharad Pawar to handover the trophy quickly and move away from the podium during the Champions Trophy was not just cultural insensitivity but plain indecency & lack of civility by any culture’s standards. His constant inquiry with the umpires is worse than schoolboy stuff – apparently they behave better these days. Oh...the list goes on, let me stop here.
For all this, I wouldn’t still have a problem if he doesn’t have a pretence to be a saint. That’s where I have real problem. He keeps reiterating that he and his team plays perfectly within the spirit of the game – whatever that means. The Australian team under Waugh and later (&more so) under Ponting have been as bad ambassadors of Cricket as any game can ever have. But then there is another branch of philosophy . Should a great player be necessarily a great ambassador of the game – yes, we all wish so but is that necessary? Aren’t we asking too much of our sportspersons and other celebrities than we ask of ourselves? Well, these debates have been done to death for centuries with no clear answers. Maradona was not a saint and so was Schumacher (just to name 2) but don’t we all celebrate them? If we come across a Federer or a Tendulkar let’s just be extra grateful to them and move on rather than setting them as benchmarks and judging others by it.
Personally I alternate between both the philosophies! So when I think a great player has also to be a great representative of the game (which is the mood I am in right now!), I don’t think Ponting deserves the title one bit and when I am in a contrarian philosophy mood, I think Ponting deserves the title of “Player of the decade” (i.e, as an objective observer, personally I would have gone for one of Gilly, Mcgrath or Dravid) but again not by a such a huge margin. More on that in the next post.
If those extra factors count, then Ponting has fallen way too short of deserving this title. Anyone with the slightest of sense of diplomacy would have done a much better job of damage control during the Sydneygate episode – the street fighter in him came to the fore during that whole affair. He just didn’t get what was wrong with the whole issue. That claiming of a bumped catch against Dhoni in the same series from someone who was persuading all the teams around the world to agree to take the fielders’ word for close catches was either dumb or cheap. His behavior at the press conference that day was imperialistic. His barking at Srinath who was apologizing for hurting him with a bouncer in a test match is a shot from pre-civilized world. His pointing the bat and accusing of Duncan Fletcher after he was run out by a substitute in the Ashes was rather amusing. His barbs at calling Lara selfish after he scored 400 to snatch the record back from Hayden were ungracious. His gesture to Sharad Pawar to handover the trophy quickly and move away from the podium during the Champions Trophy was not just cultural insensitivity but plain indecency & lack of civility by any culture’s standards. His constant inquiry with the umpires is worse than schoolboy stuff – apparently they behave better these days. Oh...the list goes on, let me stop here.
For all this, I wouldn’t still have a problem if he doesn’t have a pretence to be a saint. That’s where I have real problem. He keeps reiterating that he and his team plays perfectly within the spirit of the game – whatever that means. The Australian team under Waugh and later (&more so) under Ponting have been as bad ambassadors of Cricket as any game can ever have. But then there is another branch of philosophy . Should a great player be necessarily a great ambassador of the game – yes, we all wish so but is that necessary? Aren’t we asking too much of our sportspersons and other celebrities than we ask of ourselves? Well, these debates have been done to death for centuries with no clear answers. Maradona was not a saint and so was Schumacher (just to name 2) but don’t we all celebrate them? If we come across a Federer or a Tendulkar let’s just be extra grateful to them and move on rather than setting them as benchmarks and judging others by it.
Personally I alternate between both the philosophies! So when I think a great player has also to be a great representative of the game (which is the mood I am in right now!), I don’t think Ponting deserves the title one bit and when I am in a contrarian philosophy mood, I think Ponting deserves the title of “Player of the decade” (i.e, as an objective observer, personally I would have gone for one of Gilly, Mcgrath or Dravid) but again not by a such a huge margin. More on that in the next post.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
BCCI at it again...
Like the bottomless coke offer, BCCI has a bottomless incompetence offer to the cricket followers of the country. First of all to schedule the country's premier domestic contest from Monday to Friday takes extraordinary vision and meticulous planning...really! Then to have two teams from where the country's 2 best batsmen hail, making it to the finals was a real blessing and the ideal trump card needed for marketing the game on a grand scale. But how can we expect BCCI to have foresight and schedule the matches in such a way that it doesn't clash with the all important net practice before a crucial test against the all conquering B'ladesh! Really when did we start expecting such professionalism from our beloved BCCI...
BTW anyone's money still on K'nataka? What if Manish Pandey rises to the occasion in the fourth innings?
Is this the same old Aavishkar Salvi (the almost Mcgrath!) playing for Mumbai again? Where was he absconding all this while?
What's about my blogs that motivates people so much - first it was Dhoni, then Bhajji, now the almost Mcgrath???
When will Agarkar retire?
Is the pitch at "Gangothri Glades" the best in the country today?
The most heart-warming aspect of this classic in progress is this comment by a cricinfo follower:
"Darshan: “Update From Mysore – My colleague just got back to office from the Gangotri glades & said the ground is jam packed with lots of Buzz, Hats off to the curator for making such a CRICKET FRIENDLY PITCH!" (I got this from Prem Panicker's blog)
If on a weekday somewhere in Mysore without any of the star players, good quality cricket can generate this kind of a following, imagine what could have been if BCCI had any bit of sense in them to fittingly host this most important match of our premier domestic tournament...But then, do we expect any better from BCCI? I order a hostile takeover of BCCI with immediate effect...
BTW anyone's money still on K'nataka? What if Manish Pandey rises to the occasion in the fourth innings?
Is this the same old Aavishkar Salvi (the almost Mcgrath!) playing for Mumbai again? Where was he absconding all this while?
What's about my blogs that motivates people so much - first it was Dhoni, then Bhajji, now the almost Mcgrath???
When will Agarkar retire?
Is the pitch at "Gangothri Glades" the best in the country today?
The most heart-warming aspect of this classic in progress is this comment by a cricinfo follower:
"Darshan: “Update From Mysore – My colleague just got back to office from the Gangotri glades & said the ground is jam packed with lots of Buzz, Hats off to the curator for making such a CRICKET FRIENDLY PITCH!" (I got this from Prem Panicker's blog)
If on a weekday somewhere in Mysore without any of the star players, good quality cricket can generate this kind of a following, imagine what could have been if BCCI had any bit of sense in them to fittingly host this most important match of our premier domestic tournament...But then, do we expect any better from BCCI? I order a hostile takeover of BCCI with immediate effect...
Sunday, January 10, 2010
Best Spells of the decade
I thought it would be an easier job to select the best spells in a batsman dominated decade and now I know I couldn't have been more wrong. Expect you guys to come out with a list of those spells that I narrowly or broadly missed out! Here we go, my compilation of the 11 best spells of the decade and the usual disclaimers apply:
Shoaib Akhtar’s 5 for 21 vs Australia at Colombo, 2002
This was the time when “Australian batting collapse” was unofficially taken off from the cricketing lexicon and when it occasionally did re-surface, it still meant a decent score on the board. During those juggernaut days, Australia played a characteristic test agt Pak in Colombo amassing a huge first innings total and then taking a lead of 188 by dismissing Pak for a moderate score. Even at this impregnable position, if anyone in the world could make Aussies nervous it was the mercurial Shoaib Akhtar. And he vindicated that fear on this day. At 74 for one, Aussies were sailing along comfortably, when Shoaib ran havoc with their famed batting line up. It was the most deadly spell of fast bowling that I have seen live. Ponting was beaten for sheer pace, Mark Waugh couldn’t do anything about another thunderbolt hitting the timber, then he nearly cleaned up Steve Waugh for a hat-trick but Waugh marginally survived. But that didn’t matter, he got him the next ball with another full, fast, swinging bullet that trapped him plumb in front. The world’s most vaunted middle order was finished in a matter of 4 balls. But that was not all. There was a little matter of a Gilly left. But the way Shoaib was going, it looked beyond even Gilly that day and so it proved a couple of overs later. Shoaib sprints in and bowls the inevitable full, swinging Yorker which goes through all that Gilly could bring into arrest the ball’s momentum and hits the base of the leg stump. It was fearsome. If Michael Holding was consistently such a threat or superior, God, I so regret the fact that I was born so late.
Anil Kumble’s 7 for 48 vs Australia at Chepauk, 2004
I remember watching this match live in Chepauk. After the B’lore horror, things were not looking much better in Chennai either, with Australia motoring to 180 odd for the loss of just 2 wickets. It was irritating to see Ganguly preferring Harbhajan over Kumble for so long. I thought I would come back home rather than go through this pain. But then, convinced myself to stay back rationalizing that it was very similar the last time around in 2001 as well and how things changed in the post tea session then. I am so glad I stayed back. If I was angered by Ganguly preferring Bhajji over Kumble, how would Kumble have been feeling? Well, we got to know over the next 2 hours. This was post surgery Kumble at his very best, with a lot more variations and a little more flight (But that Michael Clarke LBW was quintessentially good ol' Kumble though), he ran through the Australian line up in less than a session. From 180 odd for 2, Aussies were folded out for 235! At the end of the day in the press conference, Gilly summed up the spell perfectly by equating it with Ambrose’s perth spell. If an Australian rates anything in the same league as the Ambrose’s spell in Perth, you better know that they were rattled and rattled badly…
Anil Kumble’s 5 for 60 vs Pakistan at Bangalore, 2007
This might seem a weird choice if you haven’t seen the spell and if you have, you wouldn’t disagree with me one bit. This was also Kumble’s first series as Captain. India made 626 in the first innings, Pak made 537 in reply and with India at 131/2 in their second innings at the end of 4th day, it was all set to be another dull draw. And so Kumble allowed his batsmen to have an extended batting practice and declared when all the top order batsmen were done with their practice, with 40 odd overs left in the day and 374 to get for Pakistan. With a draw looming large, Kumble decided to try some seam ups for fun..oh boy did he bring out the Dennis Lilee in him. Yaseer Hameed was cleaned up by searing outswinger! Younis Khan lobbed a catch back to another seam up, Salman Butt was caught behind , Faisal Iqbal allowed his rush of blood to get the better of him. Now all of a sudden the test match had come to life, in walked Kamran Akmal to face the fiercest competitor on a cricket field. This would stay in my memory for as long as I live. Kumble bowled another searing outswinger which completely beat the forward prod from Kamran Akmal leaving him absolutely shell-shocked, comfortably dislodging the off bails. Both Yaseer Hameed’s and Akmal’s dismissals would have made Deniss Lilee proud. At 162 for 7 and with around 10 overs remaining, Pakistan must thank their stars, for bad light abandoned the day’s play, saving them from sheer embarrassment.
Shane Warne 4 for 49 vs England at Adelaide, 2006
After a humiliation in the first test at Brisbane, England under Flintoff were putting on a real fight in the second test at Adelaide. England amassed a huge first innings score of 551 and even took a small first innings lead, ending the fourth day at 59 for 1 in their second innings. The test was all set to end in a draw with England drawing more momentum out of this test. But some brain freeze in the English think tank and a Wily Warne just completely swung the balance of the match. Resuming the innings on the fifth day the English batsmen were so bafflingly defensive, they didn’t look like playing for a draw but committing suicide. That’s exactly the inch of a chance that Warne needed and he got it. Then through the first session on the final day, he flighted the ball, drifted it in, turned it out, zooted it flat for England to blink first, blink first is exactly they did! Warne first took Strauss with a looping delivery (a dodgy decision though), then castled Pieterson with a sheer beauty and that set the cat amongst the pigeons and the rest is history. That Warne helped him himself for a couple more tail ender wickets maybe added for record’s sake, but the fact of the matter is that he sealed the match by interrogating and surveying the batsmen for 32 overs of masterful deceit, that exposed England and their brain freeze. England played out 73 overs but unfortunately & strangely made only 129! And Aussies were more than happy to complete the formality of overhauling the target of 168.
Glenn McGrath’s 6 for 17 vs West Indies at Brisbane, 2000
That Mcgrath will torment WI so thoroughly for a decade started here. Infact, I would argue that his hat-trick in the next match was set up here. He doesn’t bowl express pace, doesn’t possess magical deliveries, infact doesn’t even swing the ball prodigiously. But this spell is the epitome of his greatness. Like I wrote about Warne’s spell, in this spell Mcgrath surveyed the batsmen’s temperament like a masterful Psychiatrist. He set the agenda very clear – if you want to score, you better earn every run. He was hitting the channel every ball for 20 consecutive overs and the result was 6 for 17 with 12 maidens! Just building pressure ball after ball has never looked so glamorous, so compelling to watch. As if continuing from where he left in the first innings, he also got a 4 for in the second innings to finish with the cheapest 10 for in the history of the game – 10 for 27. With Mcgrath the corridor of uncertainty is such a certainty!
Muttiah Muralitharan’s 6 for 59 vs Australia at Galle, 2004
The all-conquering Aussies after rolling past all and sundry halted at Station SriLanka, to establish their supremacy over the magic of Murali. Facing Murali for the first time after he had mastered that dark art of doosra, Aussies failed the litmus test against Murali rather woefully. Murali took it upon himself to dislodge 2 of Australia’s best players of spin in Hayden – to his most affable weapon (the sweep shot) and Lehman to his most dangerous vulnerability (shuffling too far across the stumps). From then on he destroyed the rest of the batting order to bring Australia down from 148 for 3 to 220 all out! Its entirely another story that Aussies came back from a 181 run deficit in the first innings to win the match…
Jermaine Lawson’s 7 for 78 vs Australia at Antigua, 2003
It’s fairly obvious that most of the great spells have been against Australia. So supreme was their batting line up during their heymonths (heydays is too small a period to describe their domination) that it took an extraordinary bowling performance from their opponent to make a match of it. One such performance was from a then relatively unknown guy called Jermaine Lawson. This was a deadly devastation. He ripped through the Australian top order with a sustained spell of wonderful fast bowling and then later came back spitting venom to clean up the tail. The way he destroyed the tail was a throwback to those West Indian pace battery days, Lee was out fending and no different was the treatment to Mcgill and Gillespie either. Ruthless is the word. As devastating as the spell was, it still required a world record fourth innings chase (at that time) for West Indies to put it across Australia…
Ajanta Mendis’s 6 for 117 vs India at Galle, 2008
He had already served a warning to the world in the finals of the Asia cup. But we thought that was against a young Indian batting line up in an ODI match. Cometh the test series, the senior pros would be back and would put him in his place – after all they are the best players of spin on the planet. He made a great start to his career by weaving his magic against the famed Indian middle order in the first test and picked up 4 fors in both the innings. But his best spell came in the next test. Mendis started it all by somehow bowling a leg cutter with a spinner’s action to trap Gambhir in front and broke a great opening partnership. In came Dravid, out came another carom ball from Mendis’ hands and out walked Dravid disappointed! He had Dravid’s number all series. Then, he was toying with the guy who I rate as the best player of spin in the world along with Brian Lara – VVS Laxman. Laxman nudged, edged and scratched his way to 39 before he was inevitably out to Mendis! Accounted for Karthik with another of his trademark deliveries trapping him in front and mopped up the tail with ease. But this spell didn’t quite get its due because Sehwag was taking him to the cleaners at the same time as he was embarrassing the rest of our famed batting line up!
Harbhajan Singh’s 8 for 84 vs Australia at Chepauk, 2001
This is the best test match I have watched live in a stadium. I remember watching this match from the D stand, where once Hayden holed out to mid-wicket we were pretty sure Harbhajan would run through the rest. Run through is what he exactly did! After a blinder in the Mumbai test, Gilly was having a horrendous time in the rest of the series and was sent in at no. 3 to fix his form but it didn’t make any difference. Harbhajan fired a quick one straight and Gilly was hit on the pads dead in front, bowled a beauty of a drifter to get rid of Slater, then ran into that man of all lazy elegance – Mark Waugh. He was putting on a sterling exhbition on how to play quality spin bowling. I got bogged down and started to walk out of the stand, heading home. Then I heard the whole stadium erupt in joy and we all know what that means – so happily went back and thankfully found my place back too! From then on it was a Harbhajan show all the way. Ponting came out all aggressive lofting Bhajji over long on for a six, but really, did anyone expect it to last? No, and so duly Ponting guided Harbhajan to Dravid and walked back. Then came the funniest dismissal of all – Warne did everything he could to gift a wicket to Bhajji off the last ball of the day by shuffling thrice before finally padding up right in front of the stumps. Harbhajan on resumption cleaned up Waugh, Gillespie and Miller as his wont to finish with an 8 for to go with a 7 for in the first innings. And appropriately scored the winning runs too!
Steve Harmison’s 7 for 12 vs West Indies at Jamaica, 2004
If someone has a bowling analysis of 7 for 12 in 12.3 overs with 8 maidens, then it ought to be rated amongst the very best. It was almost like a lottery, he looked like getting a wicket of almost every ball that he bowled. I must mention that the inadequacy of the WI batting contributed a lot, but nevertheless this was Harmison at his penetrative best. First he dismissed Gayle and Sarwan with good hard 'hitting the deck' fast bowling, then rapped Chanderpaul hard on the arms to have him out "played on" a little later! If he was so good to the top order, he was a little better for the rest and mopped up the tail in no time and finished with his career best figures & inflicted on WI its lowest ever test score of 47!
Simon Jones’s 6 for 53 vs Australia at Old Trafford, 2005
For all the penetrative spells of Flintoff throughout the Ashes, it was this spell from Simon Jones which broke Australia’s back. They won the second test in which Flintoff towered over the rest but it was a close run thing. Also Mcgrath was absent. At 1-1 against Australia’s best XI, it was here at Old Trafford that England actually won the Ashes by taking a decisive 2-1 lead. And the architect of that was a man who is destined to spend the rest of his career in obscurity. Anyone who has seen him before knows that with a short run up Simon Jones can generate serious pace but what he did in this innings was to combine a deadly reverse swing with that serious pace. With a semi-old ball he was able to get the ball to reverse and he did that to telling effect by ripping through the Australian lower order after dismissing Ponting earlier in the innings helping England take a 142 run first innings lead. The Aussies were so shaken by this spell of reverse swing that Australian media started claiming that letting Cooley join the English Camp was one of Cricket Australia’s biggest mistakes! This spell also exposed the lack of technical knowledge of the most successful coach of all time – one Mr.John Buchanan, he couldn’t spell reverse swing leave alone explaining it!
Shoaib Akhtar’s 5 for 21 vs Australia at Colombo, 2002
This was the time when “Australian batting collapse” was unofficially taken off from the cricketing lexicon and when it occasionally did re-surface, it still meant a decent score on the board. During those juggernaut days, Australia played a characteristic test agt Pak in Colombo amassing a huge first innings total and then taking a lead of 188 by dismissing Pak for a moderate score. Even at this impregnable position, if anyone in the world could make Aussies nervous it was the mercurial Shoaib Akhtar. And he vindicated that fear on this day. At 74 for one, Aussies were sailing along comfortably, when Shoaib ran havoc with their famed batting line up. It was the most deadly spell of fast bowling that I have seen live. Ponting was beaten for sheer pace, Mark Waugh couldn’t do anything about another thunderbolt hitting the timber, then he nearly cleaned up Steve Waugh for a hat-trick but Waugh marginally survived. But that didn’t matter, he got him the next ball with another full, fast, swinging bullet that trapped him plumb in front. The world’s most vaunted middle order was finished in a matter of 4 balls. But that was not all. There was a little matter of a Gilly left. But the way Shoaib was going, it looked beyond even Gilly that day and so it proved a couple of overs later. Shoaib sprints in and bowls the inevitable full, swinging Yorker which goes through all that Gilly could bring into arrest the ball’s momentum and hits the base of the leg stump. It was fearsome. If Michael Holding was consistently such a threat or superior, God, I so regret the fact that I was born so late.
Anil Kumble’s 7 for 48 vs Australia at Chepauk, 2004
I remember watching this match live in Chepauk. After the B’lore horror, things were not looking much better in Chennai either, with Australia motoring to 180 odd for the loss of just 2 wickets. It was irritating to see Ganguly preferring Harbhajan over Kumble for so long. I thought I would come back home rather than go through this pain. But then, convinced myself to stay back rationalizing that it was very similar the last time around in 2001 as well and how things changed in the post tea session then. I am so glad I stayed back. If I was angered by Ganguly preferring Bhajji over Kumble, how would Kumble have been feeling? Well, we got to know over the next 2 hours. This was post surgery Kumble at his very best, with a lot more variations and a little more flight (But that Michael Clarke LBW was quintessentially good ol' Kumble though), he ran through the Australian line up in less than a session. From 180 odd for 2, Aussies were folded out for 235! At the end of the day in the press conference, Gilly summed up the spell perfectly by equating it with Ambrose’s perth spell. If an Australian rates anything in the same league as the Ambrose’s spell in Perth, you better know that they were rattled and rattled badly…
Anil Kumble’s 5 for 60 vs Pakistan at Bangalore, 2007
This might seem a weird choice if you haven’t seen the spell and if you have, you wouldn’t disagree with me one bit. This was also Kumble’s first series as Captain. India made 626 in the first innings, Pak made 537 in reply and with India at 131/2 in their second innings at the end of 4th day, it was all set to be another dull draw. And so Kumble allowed his batsmen to have an extended batting practice and declared when all the top order batsmen were done with their practice, with 40 odd overs left in the day and 374 to get for Pakistan. With a draw looming large, Kumble decided to try some seam ups for fun..oh boy did he bring out the Dennis Lilee in him. Yaseer Hameed was cleaned up by searing outswinger! Younis Khan lobbed a catch back to another seam up, Salman Butt was caught behind , Faisal Iqbal allowed his rush of blood to get the better of him. Now all of a sudden the test match had come to life, in walked Kamran Akmal to face the fiercest competitor on a cricket field. This would stay in my memory for as long as I live. Kumble bowled another searing outswinger which completely beat the forward prod from Kamran Akmal leaving him absolutely shell-shocked, comfortably dislodging the off bails. Both Yaseer Hameed’s and Akmal’s dismissals would have made Deniss Lilee proud. At 162 for 7 and with around 10 overs remaining, Pakistan must thank their stars, for bad light abandoned the day’s play, saving them from sheer embarrassment.
Shane Warne 4 for 49 vs England at Adelaide, 2006
After a humiliation in the first test at Brisbane, England under Flintoff were putting on a real fight in the second test at Adelaide. England amassed a huge first innings score of 551 and even took a small first innings lead, ending the fourth day at 59 for 1 in their second innings. The test was all set to end in a draw with England drawing more momentum out of this test. But some brain freeze in the English think tank and a Wily Warne just completely swung the balance of the match. Resuming the innings on the fifth day the English batsmen were so bafflingly defensive, they didn’t look like playing for a draw but committing suicide. That’s exactly the inch of a chance that Warne needed and he got it. Then through the first session on the final day, he flighted the ball, drifted it in, turned it out, zooted it flat for England to blink first, blink first is exactly they did! Warne first took Strauss with a looping delivery (a dodgy decision though), then castled Pieterson with a sheer beauty and that set the cat amongst the pigeons and the rest is history. That Warne helped him himself for a couple more tail ender wickets maybe added for record’s sake, but the fact of the matter is that he sealed the match by interrogating and surveying the batsmen for 32 overs of masterful deceit, that exposed England and their brain freeze. England played out 73 overs but unfortunately & strangely made only 129! And Aussies were more than happy to complete the formality of overhauling the target of 168.
Glenn McGrath’s 6 for 17 vs West Indies at Brisbane, 2000
That Mcgrath will torment WI so thoroughly for a decade started here. Infact, I would argue that his hat-trick in the next match was set up here. He doesn’t bowl express pace, doesn’t possess magical deliveries, infact doesn’t even swing the ball prodigiously. But this spell is the epitome of his greatness. Like I wrote about Warne’s spell, in this spell Mcgrath surveyed the batsmen’s temperament like a masterful Psychiatrist. He set the agenda very clear – if you want to score, you better earn every run. He was hitting the channel every ball for 20 consecutive overs and the result was 6 for 17 with 12 maidens! Just building pressure ball after ball has never looked so glamorous, so compelling to watch. As if continuing from where he left in the first innings, he also got a 4 for in the second innings to finish with the cheapest 10 for in the history of the game – 10 for 27. With Mcgrath the corridor of uncertainty is such a certainty!
Muttiah Muralitharan’s 6 for 59 vs Australia at Galle, 2004
The all-conquering Aussies after rolling past all and sundry halted at Station SriLanka, to establish their supremacy over the magic of Murali. Facing Murali for the first time after he had mastered that dark art of doosra, Aussies failed the litmus test against Murali rather woefully. Murali took it upon himself to dislodge 2 of Australia’s best players of spin in Hayden – to his most affable weapon (the sweep shot) and Lehman to his most dangerous vulnerability (shuffling too far across the stumps). From then on he destroyed the rest of the batting order to bring Australia down from 148 for 3 to 220 all out! Its entirely another story that Aussies came back from a 181 run deficit in the first innings to win the match…
Jermaine Lawson’s 7 for 78 vs Australia at Antigua, 2003
It’s fairly obvious that most of the great spells have been against Australia. So supreme was their batting line up during their heymonths (heydays is too small a period to describe their domination) that it took an extraordinary bowling performance from their opponent to make a match of it. One such performance was from a then relatively unknown guy called Jermaine Lawson. This was a deadly devastation. He ripped through the Australian top order with a sustained spell of wonderful fast bowling and then later came back spitting venom to clean up the tail. The way he destroyed the tail was a throwback to those West Indian pace battery days, Lee was out fending and no different was the treatment to Mcgill and Gillespie either. Ruthless is the word. As devastating as the spell was, it still required a world record fourth innings chase (at that time) for West Indies to put it across Australia…
Ajanta Mendis’s 6 for 117 vs India at Galle, 2008
He had already served a warning to the world in the finals of the Asia cup. But we thought that was against a young Indian batting line up in an ODI match. Cometh the test series, the senior pros would be back and would put him in his place – after all they are the best players of spin on the planet. He made a great start to his career by weaving his magic against the famed Indian middle order in the first test and picked up 4 fors in both the innings. But his best spell came in the next test. Mendis started it all by somehow bowling a leg cutter with a spinner’s action to trap Gambhir in front and broke a great opening partnership. In came Dravid, out came another carom ball from Mendis’ hands and out walked Dravid disappointed! He had Dravid’s number all series. Then, he was toying with the guy who I rate as the best player of spin in the world along with Brian Lara – VVS Laxman. Laxman nudged, edged and scratched his way to 39 before he was inevitably out to Mendis! Accounted for Karthik with another of his trademark deliveries trapping him in front and mopped up the tail with ease. But this spell didn’t quite get its due because Sehwag was taking him to the cleaners at the same time as he was embarrassing the rest of our famed batting line up!
Harbhajan Singh’s 8 for 84 vs Australia at Chepauk, 2001
This is the best test match I have watched live in a stadium. I remember watching this match from the D stand, where once Hayden holed out to mid-wicket we were pretty sure Harbhajan would run through the rest. Run through is what he exactly did! After a blinder in the Mumbai test, Gilly was having a horrendous time in the rest of the series and was sent in at no. 3 to fix his form but it didn’t make any difference. Harbhajan fired a quick one straight and Gilly was hit on the pads dead in front, bowled a beauty of a drifter to get rid of Slater, then ran into that man of all lazy elegance – Mark Waugh. He was putting on a sterling exhbition on how to play quality spin bowling. I got bogged down and started to walk out of the stand, heading home. Then I heard the whole stadium erupt in joy and we all know what that means – so happily went back and thankfully found my place back too! From then on it was a Harbhajan show all the way. Ponting came out all aggressive lofting Bhajji over long on for a six, but really, did anyone expect it to last? No, and so duly Ponting guided Harbhajan to Dravid and walked back. Then came the funniest dismissal of all – Warne did everything he could to gift a wicket to Bhajji off the last ball of the day by shuffling thrice before finally padding up right in front of the stumps. Harbhajan on resumption cleaned up Waugh, Gillespie and Miller as his wont to finish with an 8 for to go with a 7 for in the first innings. And appropriately scored the winning runs too!
Steve Harmison’s 7 for 12 vs West Indies at Jamaica, 2004
If someone has a bowling analysis of 7 for 12 in 12.3 overs with 8 maidens, then it ought to be rated amongst the very best. It was almost like a lottery, he looked like getting a wicket of almost every ball that he bowled. I must mention that the inadequacy of the WI batting contributed a lot, but nevertheless this was Harmison at his penetrative best. First he dismissed Gayle and Sarwan with good hard 'hitting the deck' fast bowling, then rapped Chanderpaul hard on the arms to have him out "played on" a little later! If he was so good to the top order, he was a little better for the rest and mopped up the tail in no time and finished with his career best figures & inflicted on WI its lowest ever test score of 47!
Simon Jones’s 6 for 53 vs Australia at Old Trafford, 2005
For all the penetrative spells of Flintoff throughout the Ashes, it was this spell from Simon Jones which broke Australia’s back. They won the second test in which Flintoff towered over the rest but it was a close run thing. Also Mcgrath was absent. At 1-1 against Australia’s best XI, it was here at Old Trafford that England actually won the Ashes by taking a decisive 2-1 lead. And the architect of that was a man who is destined to spend the rest of his career in obscurity. Anyone who has seen him before knows that with a short run up Simon Jones can generate serious pace but what he did in this innings was to combine a deadly reverse swing with that serious pace. With a semi-old ball he was able to get the ball to reverse and he did that to telling effect by ripping through the Australian lower order after dismissing Ponting earlier in the innings helping England take a 142 run first innings lead. The Aussies were so shaken by this spell of reverse swing that Australian media started claiming that letting Cooley join the English Camp was one of Cricket Australia’s biggest mistakes! This spell also exposed the lack of technical knowledge of the most successful coach of all time – one Mr.John Buchanan, he couldn’t spell reverse swing leave alone explaining it!
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Best innings of the decade- The ones to miss out...
Whenever, there is a list being compiled, its a tug of war between me and Hesh as to who gets to describe a particular innings or shot or spell. That didnt happen this time as Hesh beat me comfortably by releasing this list, and for once I dont have any regrets about it(except one which missed out)!
Well, here is my list of innings which I feel, narrowly missed out:
Adam Gilchrist 122 vs India Mumbai 2001
99/5, Harbhajan causing a riot, Gilly answers him also with a riot! In a matter of 2 hours he changed the complexion of the game completely....
Rahul Dravid at Jamaica 2006/07
Though it was just a couple of 50s, the fact that it was a very dodgy pitch and nobody from either side crossed 50 in both innings, and this lead to a series victory in Caribbean after 30 years odd, and add to that the quality of shot making he showed on a two paced wicket, this was one of the best efforts from an Indian batsman for a very long time...
Virender Sehwag 319 at Chennai
You come to bat at the end of the 2nd day and score 52 not out on the deadest of pitches when the opposition has scored 550 plus. By the end of the third day, you are talking about your team scoring 700 and getting them out on the 5th! No wonder people have started cults on his name!!
Sachin Tendulkar 155 Bloemfontein 2001
The result was a loss, but the quality of the innings cannot be doubted, nor the situation. 50/4 with two debutants to follow, (forget one of them was Sehwag, we didnt know about him yet!!) he counter attacks the bowling so much that, by the time India was around 100/4 those watching had already decided that SA is going to pay heavily....
Rahul Dravid 180 Eden Gardens 2001
Now whats wrong with this innings that it doesnt feature in Hesh's? It was Dravid's solidity at one end that allowed Laxman to play so freely, on the 4th day. He made 39 of 196 balls in the previous test, to come out and play an innings like this is truely extrodinary...
Andrew Flintoff Edgbaston 2005
Yes, Arun.... we too support English cricketers, but then they have to produce something as special as this. With only, the last wicket for company, Flintoff finally played a special innings, which we were only hearing about for some years from the commentators. Take into account that the margin of victory was only 2 runs, this one is very special indeed...
Kamran Akmal Karachi 2005
Irfan Pathan had made history with a first over hat trick, and at 39/6 Pakistan were staring down the barrel. From a situation like this, there is only one team in the world that can win a test match and thats Pak too, Akmal came in and played a truely magnificent innings, to put them back on course.
Graeme Smith Perth 2008
Any chase in the 4th innings is difficult and that too against Aus, when you are SA you always have demons to slay. But probably, Smith is the one Protea who has actually looked AUS in the eye, and he stood up again to play a captain's knock from which the other guys took inspiration to pull of an incredible chase.
Chandepaul vs Aus 2004
Now, he was the last guy whom you would associate with fastest centuries, but on this day, he was breathtaking. Just when the Aussies think they have seen the back of Lara, and can breathe easily, in comes this man to hammer them into oblivion!
Lara 400 vs England
Forget about the dead pitch, forget this didnt contribute in a win, forget that England had a mediocre attack, put any batsman in the same situation with the same bowlers and ask him to score atleast 150, with half the class, style, grace and timing, and they still wont come near this man....Many were unhappy that Hayden had over taken Lara's record, but then those people had underestimated the Prince....
Well, here is my list of innings which I feel, narrowly missed out:
Adam Gilchrist 122 vs India Mumbai 2001
99/5, Harbhajan causing a riot, Gilly answers him also with a riot! In a matter of 2 hours he changed the complexion of the game completely....
Rahul Dravid at Jamaica 2006/07
Though it was just a couple of 50s, the fact that it was a very dodgy pitch and nobody from either side crossed 50 in both innings, and this lead to a series victory in Caribbean after 30 years odd, and add to that the quality of shot making he showed on a two paced wicket, this was one of the best efforts from an Indian batsman for a very long time...
Virender Sehwag 319 at Chennai
You come to bat at the end of the 2nd day and score 52 not out on the deadest of pitches when the opposition has scored 550 plus. By the end of the third day, you are talking about your team scoring 700 and getting them out on the 5th! No wonder people have started cults on his name!!
Sachin Tendulkar 155 Bloemfontein 2001
The result was a loss, but the quality of the innings cannot be doubted, nor the situation. 50/4 with two debutants to follow, (forget one of them was Sehwag, we didnt know about him yet!!) he counter attacks the bowling so much that, by the time India was around 100/4 those watching had already decided that SA is going to pay heavily....
Rahul Dravid 180 Eden Gardens 2001
Now whats wrong with this innings that it doesnt feature in Hesh's? It was Dravid's solidity at one end that allowed Laxman to play so freely, on the 4th day. He made 39 of 196 balls in the previous test, to come out and play an innings like this is truely extrodinary...
Andrew Flintoff Edgbaston 2005
Yes, Arun.... we too support English cricketers, but then they have to produce something as special as this. With only, the last wicket for company, Flintoff finally played a special innings, which we were only hearing about for some years from the commentators. Take into account that the margin of victory was only 2 runs, this one is very special indeed...
Kamran Akmal Karachi 2005
Irfan Pathan had made history with a first over hat trick, and at 39/6 Pakistan were staring down the barrel. From a situation like this, there is only one team in the world that can win a test match and thats Pak too, Akmal came in and played a truely magnificent innings, to put them back on course.
Graeme Smith Perth 2008
Any chase in the 4th innings is difficult and that too against Aus, when you are SA you always have demons to slay. But probably, Smith is the one Protea who has actually looked AUS in the eye, and he stood up again to play a captain's knock from which the other guys took inspiration to pull of an incredible chase.
Chandepaul vs Aus 2004
Now, he was the last guy whom you would associate with fastest centuries, but on this day, he was breathtaking. Just when the Aussies think they have seen the back of Lara, and can breathe easily, in comes this man to hammer them into oblivion!
Lara 400 vs England
Forget about the dead pitch, forget this didnt contribute in a win, forget that England had a mediocre attack, put any batsman in the same situation with the same bowlers and ask him to score atleast 150, with half the class, style, grace and timing, and they still wont come near this man....Many were unhappy that Hayden had over taken Lara's record, but then those people had underestimated the Prince....
Best innings of the decade
At the end of a batsman dominated decade, the toughest thing is to pick a list of the best innings of the decade. The usual disclaimers that “this is a personal opinion (surely biased) based on the limited cricket that I followed during the last decade” applies. Here we go, the best 11 innings of the decade in no particular order:
VVS Laxman’s 281 vs Australia at Eden Gardens Kolkata, 2001
In my book, this is simply the best innings that I have seen marginally ahead of even Lara’s 153. This was on par with Lara’s 153 as far as the context, the pressure and the quality of opponent was concerned. But what makes this better is that in this innings when he started playing there was absolutely no hope for India, through the innings we thought we would go down fighting, towards the end we even entertained thoughts of victory – this change in context through the innings influences the batting style a great deal. For instance when you have no hope, you can counterattack like Laxman did in Sydney 1999, but once you start sensing hope your instincts don’t allow you to continue to counter attack with gay abandon, you want to have a greater control and try to mix caution with aggression, later when you move to a stage of sensing victory, you get into the territory of “fear of winning” which makes a batsman lot more circumspect. But this Laxman innings had no such change in gears, it was a counter attacking innings of the highest quality from start to finish with no noticeable change through the innings. Ian Chappell kept on harping about how the quality of stroke play and the frequency with which he was piercing the field was so strikingly similar to Lara’s 277 in Sydney throughtout the innings. Now, when you have the best attributes of 2 of Lara’s very best clubbed in one innings – that’s the cricketing equivalent of Nirvana!
Nathan Astle’s 222 vs England at Christchurch, 2002
Oh boy, this was one hell of an innings. I remember my friend’s brother (who stayed in the same apartment as we did) banging our door early in the morning to wake us up to ensure that we don’t miss out on this madness of an innings. I’ll be forever grateful to him for that intrusion! To put this madness in perspective, let me give a background of the match. The match was over in four days with England winning by 98 runs – as comfortable as it gets after NZ were set a mammoth 550 runs target in the fourth innings. What appears to be an easy England victory didn’t appear that easy when we were watching live. Starting the 4th day at 28 for no loss, after giving a valiant fight NZ looked dead and buried at 301 for 8. And that’s when Astle decided to let it rip. Let it rip – well, he did a little more than that. The next one hour was quite simply the most maddening passage of batting I have seen in a long long time in test cricket. He was launching all the English bowlers out of the park with almost a contempt, literally dancing down for every non-short delivery. It was like a celebration, a six hitting competition or something. Caddick who had taken a 6 for by that time, was taken to the cleaners and so was Hoggard. In between Chris Drum got out and in came Chris Cairns at no.11 (coz of an injury). With Carins for company, Astle blasted 118 runs in 55 minutes of 69 balls to go onto become fastest scorer of double century in tests. And during the course of the partnership if you had a look at Hussain’s reactions, you wouldn’t have believed that this is a captain defending 550 in the fourth innings with the opponents on the mat at 333 for 9. Hussain had serious fears of the match slipping away. Another hour and it was gone! If an innings can instill the fear of a loss in the opponent when chasing 550 and still more than 150 runs adrift with only one wicket in hand, it ought to be rated among the very best.
Brian Lara’s 226 vs Australia at Adelaide, 2005
This was the series that WI played in Australia immediately after that ill-conceived idea of a super test between Australia vs Rest of the world. Lara carried on his bad form from the super test into the test series as well. His 6 innings in Australia before the Adelaide test read: 5, 36, 30, 14, 13 ,45. Now this is not at all surprising with Lara and so was what followed. Before this test there was an interview of Mcgrath, Warne and Lara in an Australian newspaper where all 3 were asked the same question – Do you ever doubt your ability? I don’t remember what Mcgrath said, Warne said that he goes through phases of self-doubt when he’s in the middle of a bad patch and Lara in his characteristic style said “no, never”. That’s what makes the man – the extraordinary self-belief. So he comes out to the crease at 19 for 2 and a baggage of bad form (both personal and the team’s) against Mcgrath, Lee, Warne & Macgill and puts on a show of breathtaking stroke play like only Lara can. It had all the makings of a quintessential Lara innings – the pull, cover drive, the cut, the flick, the straight drive, the hoist over mid-wicket off both the spinners and the usual team collapsing around him! When he got out, the score was 381 and Lara scored 226 out of that!
Rahul Dravid’s 148 vs England at Headingley, 2002
The innings that truly began Dravid’s journey to greatness. In windy conditions, on a damp pitch against a decent English bowling attack, Ganguly took a huge gamble of winning the toss and batting first. This decision as per Ted Corbett’s opinion should have resulted in England folding India out for less than 250 – that’s what a good bowling attack would on a headingley first day pitch against an Indian batting line up. And at 15 for 1, we could sense the all too familiar collapse. That’s when Dravid constructs a masterpiece (with adequate support from Sanjay Bangar) of such brilliance that it seemed like he was “meditating in Mint Street”. England bowlers gave all that they had in their repertoire in favorable conditions only to see Dravid smiling and almost asking – “Oh that’s all that you have. Is it?”. By the time Dravid finished his innings, the sun was out, the bowlers were tired and then Sachin & Sourav had a feast to set up the perfect match for India. Despite a 193 from Sachin, the choice of Dravid for man of the match was unanimous.
Rahul Dravid’s 233 vs Australia at Adelaide, 2003
The doppelganger of Kolkata…After scoring 556 in the first innings and having the opponent on the mat at 85 for 4, any team could have afforded to relax leave alone Australia. But they didn’t! That’s what a good memory can do! If it was Laxman playing the lead role then, it was Dravid now. After a terrible series the previous time he had come down under and failing in the first innings in the first test in Brisbane, Dravid came into this test with all kinds of self-doubts about his ability to score runs in Australia. Under that kind of pressure and with the team reeling at 85 for 4, he summoned all his mental resolve and his water tight technique to play what must be regarded as one of the most critical innings in Indian cricket’s history. What more, he comes back in the second innings and stays there till the end scoring 72 to finish off the target of 233. It was such a huge moment for Indian Cricket that Indian news channels were showing the last few runs live!
Sachin Tendulkar’s 103 vs England at Chepauk, 2008
Could anyone have written a better script? If it was a movie script we would have called it the heights of suspension of disbelief and what if it happened in reality – Well, tears in your eyes and a lump in your throat as if you scored those runs! Sachin had some unfinished business with a fourth innings chase and Chepauk. Also this was the test series immediately after the Mumbai attacks, in fact the ODI series preceding the test series was abandoned half way through because of the terrorist attack. As if all this had to come together, we almost let England run away with the match only for the Mumbai’s most proud son to enter the scene and snatch the match away from England with the perfect innings for the situation. What more, he got to his hundred with the winning shot too. Poetic justice has never had a greater meaning!
Virender Sehwag’s 83 vs England at Chepauk, 2008
If Sachin’s innings was a masterpiece, it was so close to being a non-event but for Sehwag. England set India a target of 387 in 119 overs at 3.25 per over. The typical fourth innings chase which has the chasing team in the corridor of uncertainty all the time. To go for a win or play for a draw? What if in going for a win we end up losing and what if we if in going for a draw we don’t give ourselves a chance to win or worse in playing for a draw what if we still end up losing? Before Dhoni could even completely work through this puzzle, Sehwag had come back to the pavilion after playing 23 overs of the remaining 29 overs on the fourth day. By then Dhoni didn’t even have to think – going for the win was the only option. The equation changed from 387 at 3.25 with 10 wickets in hand to 270 at 2.81 with 9 wickets in hand! There was also the little matter of the Sehwag effect which the bowlers’ would take time to recover from…This was also the innings which changed English Cricket upside down. As England were withstanding the Sehwag carnage, Pieterson was so clueless that he ended up complaining that he didn’t get enough tactical assistance from Peter Moores!
Virender Sehwag’s 201 vs Srilanka at Galle, 2008
After the first test humiliation when the greatest players of spin bowling on the planet were made to look like novices by the M&M duo, this test didn’t seem to be much different but for Sehwag again. After a solid opening partnership India lost its way completely with only Laxman getting into even double digits. The awesome foursome were struggling to decipher the Murali-Mendis (especially Mendis) magic, Sehwag was sending them on a leather hunt – one out of sheer contempt and another coz he couln’t pick his doosra and chose to attack him all the time and it paid off! In a team score of 329, he ended up scoring 201 with only 2 other batsmen crossing double digits and what more he carried his bat through as well!
Virender Sehwag’s 292 vs Srilanka at Mumbai, 2009
After getting out for 131, if a batsman feels he has missed out – who could it be?
At 10 AM Srilanka was leading by 393 runs and at 4.30 PM Srilanka are 50 runs behind – what could be the reason?
If Sambit Bal says someone is more destructive than even Viv Richards – who could it be?
Virender Sehwag.
With one innings he made the world’s most successful bowler hasten his retirement plans! To make 284 runs in just 79 overs of play is outrageous even at club level, at test cricket level it is plain barbaric – its just not on. I have never felt so sorry for any opponent when India is dominating them, really. ..He could so easily have become the second batsman after Bradman to make 300 in a single day if he had 90 overs of play. Sehwag’s batting stats at the end of the game read: 293 runs from 254 balls with 40 fours and 7 sixes at a strike rate of 115.35! As outrageous as this is, it’s only a small part of the Sehwag destruction story! Recently in Cricinfo, the commentators and columnists were asked to pick their favorite bits of the decade and out of all the cricket played in the decade, Ian Chappell picked this innings! I thought Lara played Murali masterfully but this guy has gone even further – treated him with utter disdain. I have not seen a more audacious innings in my life.
Ricky Ponting’s 156 vs England at Old Trafford in 2005
We don’t always get too see Ricky Ponting bat under real pressure like Lara or Sachin. He played for a champion team almost from the beginning of his career who also boasted of great openers from Taylor-Slater to Hayden-Langer. So he walked in at no.3 counter attacked every opponent on his way to becoming one of the all time greats. And in the ashes of 2005 and under his own captaincy, he came across situations that outside of India he wouldn’t have faced and the pressure reflected on his batting returns. With nothing much to boast about in the first 2 tests, he comes into the 3rd test and fails in the first innings to the deadly swing bowling off Simon Jones with a single digit score. With a target of 423 in 108 overs in the fourth innings, it required a gritty solid batting performance from Australia to bail themselves out of jail. And under pressure with literally no support from his teammates, Ponting plays an absolute blinder handling the conventional swing off Hoggard with the new ball and the reverse swing of Jones and Flintoff with the old ball with equal felicity. And just as he was about to reach the finish line safe, he got a beauty from Harmison but Brett Lee held his nerves to give Australia a draw which Ponting’s back to the wall effort so thoroughly deserved. This is my favorite Ponting innings.
Kumar Sangakkara’s 192 vs Australia at Hobart, 2007
This is another Astle kind of innings but with less madness and more method. Chasing 507, Sanga walks in at 15 for 1, plays a typical counter attacking innings that we associate with him till when he decided to do an Astle as he started losing partners at frequent intervals. Once Jayasuriya got out, the rest started folding and in no time it was 290 for 8. As Aussies started licking their lips in anticipation of another crushing victory, Sanga took Lee, Johnson and Clark to cleaners almost threatening to pull of a highly improbable chase only for Rudi Kuertzen to make a howler which put paid to SL’s outside chances. As great as the innings was, equally great was Sanga’s gesture to Kuertzen’s apology at the end of the match!
Next up is Spells of the decade...
VVS Laxman’s 281 vs Australia at Eden Gardens Kolkata, 2001
In my book, this is simply the best innings that I have seen marginally ahead of even Lara’s 153. This was on par with Lara’s 153 as far as the context, the pressure and the quality of opponent was concerned. But what makes this better is that in this innings when he started playing there was absolutely no hope for India, through the innings we thought we would go down fighting, towards the end we even entertained thoughts of victory – this change in context through the innings influences the batting style a great deal. For instance when you have no hope, you can counterattack like Laxman did in Sydney 1999, but once you start sensing hope your instincts don’t allow you to continue to counter attack with gay abandon, you want to have a greater control and try to mix caution with aggression, later when you move to a stage of sensing victory, you get into the territory of “fear of winning” which makes a batsman lot more circumspect. But this Laxman innings had no such change in gears, it was a counter attacking innings of the highest quality from start to finish with no noticeable change through the innings. Ian Chappell kept on harping about how the quality of stroke play and the frequency with which he was piercing the field was so strikingly similar to Lara’s 277 in Sydney throughtout the innings. Now, when you have the best attributes of 2 of Lara’s very best clubbed in one innings – that’s the cricketing equivalent of Nirvana!
Nathan Astle’s 222 vs England at Christchurch, 2002
Oh boy, this was one hell of an innings. I remember my friend’s brother (who stayed in the same apartment as we did) banging our door early in the morning to wake us up to ensure that we don’t miss out on this madness of an innings. I’ll be forever grateful to him for that intrusion! To put this madness in perspective, let me give a background of the match. The match was over in four days with England winning by 98 runs – as comfortable as it gets after NZ were set a mammoth 550 runs target in the fourth innings. What appears to be an easy England victory didn’t appear that easy when we were watching live. Starting the 4th day at 28 for no loss, after giving a valiant fight NZ looked dead and buried at 301 for 8. And that’s when Astle decided to let it rip. Let it rip – well, he did a little more than that. The next one hour was quite simply the most maddening passage of batting I have seen in a long long time in test cricket. He was launching all the English bowlers out of the park with almost a contempt, literally dancing down for every non-short delivery. It was like a celebration, a six hitting competition or something. Caddick who had taken a 6 for by that time, was taken to the cleaners and so was Hoggard. In between Chris Drum got out and in came Chris Cairns at no.11 (coz of an injury). With Carins for company, Astle blasted 118 runs in 55 minutes of 69 balls to go onto become fastest scorer of double century in tests. And during the course of the partnership if you had a look at Hussain’s reactions, you wouldn’t have believed that this is a captain defending 550 in the fourth innings with the opponents on the mat at 333 for 9. Hussain had serious fears of the match slipping away. Another hour and it was gone! If an innings can instill the fear of a loss in the opponent when chasing 550 and still more than 150 runs adrift with only one wicket in hand, it ought to be rated among the very best.
Brian Lara’s 226 vs Australia at Adelaide, 2005
This was the series that WI played in Australia immediately after that ill-conceived idea of a super test between Australia vs Rest of the world. Lara carried on his bad form from the super test into the test series as well. His 6 innings in Australia before the Adelaide test read: 5, 36, 30, 14, 13 ,45. Now this is not at all surprising with Lara and so was what followed. Before this test there was an interview of Mcgrath, Warne and Lara in an Australian newspaper where all 3 were asked the same question – Do you ever doubt your ability? I don’t remember what Mcgrath said, Warne said that he goes through phases of self-doubt when he’s in the middle of a bad patch and Lara in his characteristic style said “no, never”. That’s what makes the man – the extraordinary self-belief. So he comes out to the crease at 19 for 2 and a baggage of bad form (both personal and the team’s) against Mcgrath, Lee, Warne & Macgill and puts on a show of breathtaking stroke play like only Lara can. It had all the makings of a quintessential Lara innings – the pull, cover drive, the cut, the flick, the straight drive, the hoist over mid-wicket off both the spinners and the usual team collapsing around him! When he got out, the score was 381 and Lara scored 226 out of that!
Rahul Dravid’s 148 vs England at Headingley, 2002
The innings that truly began Dravid’s journey to greatness. In windy conditions, on a damp pitch against a decent English bowling attack, Ganguly took a huge gamble of winning the toss and batting first. This decision as per Ted Corbett’s opinion should have resulted in England folding India out for less than 250 – that’s what a good bowling attack would on a headingley first day pitch against an Indian batting line up. And at 15 for 1, we could sense the all too familiar collapse. That’s when Dravid constructs a masterpiece (with adequate support from Sanjay Bangar) of such brilliance that it seemed like he was “meditating in Mint Street”. England bowlers gave all that they had in their repertoire in favorable conditions only to see Dravid smiling and almost asking – “Oh that’s all that you have. Is it?”. By the time Dravid finished his innings, the sun was out, the bowlers were tired and then Sachin & Sourav had a feast to set up the perfect match for India. Despite a 193 from Sachin, the choice of Dravid for man of the match was unanimous.
Rahul Dravid’s 233 vs Australia at Adelaide, 2003
The doppelganger of Kolkata…After scoring 556 in the first innings and having the opponent on the mat at 85 for 4, any team could have afforded to relax leave alone Australia. But they didn’t! That’s what a good memory can do! If it was Laxman playing the lead role then, it was Dravid now. After a terrible series the previous time he had come down under and failing in the first innings in the first test in Brisbane, Dravid came into this test with all kinds of self-doubts about his ability to score runs in Australia. Under that kind of pressure and with the team reeling at 85 for 4, he summoned all his mental resolve and his water tight technique to play what must be regarded as one of the most critical innings in Indian cricket’s history. What more, he comes back in the second innings and stays there till the end scoring 72 to finish off the target of 233. It was such a huge moment for Indian Cricket that Indian news channels were showing the last few runs live!
Sachin Tendulkar’s 103 vs England at Chepauk, 2008
Could anyone have written a better script? If it was a movie script we would have called it the heights of suspension of disbelief and what if it happened in reality – Well, tears in your eyes and a lump in your throat as if you scored those runs! Sachin had some unfinished business with a fourth innings chase and Chepauk. Also this was the test series immediately after the Mumbai attacks, in fact the ODI series preceding the test series was abandoned half way through because of the terrorist attack. As if all this had to come together, we almost let England run away with the match only for the Mumbai’s most proud son to enter the scene and snatch the match away from England with the perfect innings for the situation. What more, he got to his hundred with the winning shot too. Poetic justice has never had a greater meaning!
Virender Sehwag’s 83 vs England at Chepauk, 2008
If Sachin’s innings was a masterpiece, it was so close to being a non-event but for Sehwag. England set India a target of 387 in 119 overs at 3.25 per over. The typical fourth innings chase which has the chasing team in the corridor of uncertainty all the time. To go for a win or play for a draw? What if in going for a win we end up losing and what if we if in going for a draw we don’t give ourselves a chance to win or worse in playing for a draw what if we still end up losing? Before Dhoni could even completely work through this puzzle, Sehwag had come back to the pavilion after playing 23 overs of the remaining 29 overs on the fourth day. By then Dhoni didn’t even have to think – going for the win was the only option. The equation changed from 387 at 3.25 with 10 wickets in hand to 270 at 2.81 with 9 wickets in hand! There was also the little matter of the Sehwag effect which the bowlers’ would take time to recover from…This was also the innings which changed English Cricket upside down. As England were withstanding the Sehwag carnage, Pieterson was so clueless that he ended up complaining that he didn’t get enough tactical assistance from Peter Moores!
Virender Sehwag’s 201 vs Srilanka at Galle, 2008
After the first test humiliation when the greatest players of spin bowling on the planet were made to look like novices by the M&M duo, this test didn’t seem to be much different but for Sehwag again. After a solid opening partnership India lost its way completely with only Laxman getting into even double digits. The awesome foursome were struggling to decipher the Murali-Mendis (especially Mendis) magic, Sehwag was sending them on a leather hunt – one out of sheer contempt and another coz he couln’t pick his doosra and chose to attack him all the time and it paid off! In a team score of 329, he ended up scoring 201 with only 2 other batsmen crossing double digits and what more he carried his bat through as well!
Virender Sehwag’s 292 vs Srilanka at Mumbai, 2009
After getting out for 131, if a batsman feels he has missed out – who could it be?
At 10 AM Srilanka was leading by 393 runs and at 4.30 PM Srilanka are 50 runs behind – what could be the reason?
If Sambit Bal says someone is more destructive than even Viv Richards – who could it be?
Virender Sehwag.
With one innings he made the world’s most successful bowler hasten his retirement plans! To make 284 runs in just 79 overs of play is outrageous even at club level, at test cricket level it is plain barbaric – its just not on. I have never felt so sorry for any opponent when India is dominating them, really. ..He could so easily have become the second batsman after Bradman to make 300 in a single day if he had 90 overs of play. Sehwag’s batting stats at the end of the game read: 293 runs from 254 balls with 40 fours and 7 sixes at a strike rate of 115.35! As outrageous as this is, it’s only a small part of the Sehwag destruction story! Recently in Cricinfo, the commentators and columnists were asked to pick their favorite bits of the decade and out of all the cricket played in the decade, Ian Chappell picked this innings! I thought Lara played Murali masterfully but this guy has gone even further – treated him with utter disdain. I have not seen a more audacious innings in my life.
Ricky Ponting’s 156 vs England at Old Trafford in 2005
We don’t always get too see Ricky Ponting bat under real pressure like Lara or Sachin. He played for a champion team almost from the beginning of his career who also boasted of great openers from Taylor-Slater to Hayden-Langer. So he walked in at no.3 counter attacked every opponent on his way to becoming one of the all time greats. And in the ashes of 2005 and under his own captaincy, he came across situations that outside of India he wouldn’t have faced and the pressure reflected on his batting returns. With nothing much to boast about in the first 2 tests, he comes into the 3rd test and fails in the first innings to the deadly swing bowling off Simon Jones with a single digit score. With a target of 423 in 108 overs in the fourth innings, it required a gritty solid batting performance from Australia to bail themselves out of jail. And under pressure with literally no support from his teammates, Ponting plays an absolute blinder handling the conventional swing off Hoggard with the new ball and the reverse swing of Jones and Flintoff with the old ball with equal felicity. And just as he was about to reach the finish line safe, he got a beauty from Harmison but Brett Lee held his nerves to give Australia a draw which Ponting’s back to the wall effort so thoroughly deserved. This is my favorite Ponting innings.
Kumar Sangakkara’s 192 vs Australia at Hobart, 2007
This is another Astle kind of innings but with less madness and more method. Chasing 507, Sanga walks in at 15 for 1, plays a typical counter attacking innings that we associate with him till when he decided to do an Astle as he started losing partners at frequent intervals. Once Jayasuriya got out, the rest started folding and in no time it was 290 for 8. As Aussies started licking their lips in anticipation of another crushing victory, Sanga took Lee, Johnson and Clark to cleaners almost threatening to pull of a highly improbable chase only for Rudi Kuertzen to make a howler which put paid to SL’s outside chances. As great as the innings was, equally great was Sanga’s gesture to Kuertzen’s apology at the end of the match!
Next up is Spells of the decade...
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Defining piece about Cricket in the last decade
This article by Siddhartha Vaidhyanathan in Cricinfo perfectly sums up the last decade. Whatever happened to context!
http://www.cricinfo.com/decadereview2009/content/story/439734.html
http://www.cricinfo.com/decadereview2009/content/story/439734.html
Tuesday, January 5, 2010
Following on......
Wow.... I do not have any other words to describe Hesh's blog. It just started a whole train of thoughts in my mind which left me reminiscing the test match all over again(during office hours after a long vacation, with lots of work to do, he he) but I do not have any single point to add on the match which Hesh hasn't mentioned(May be Dravid's spill of Steve Waugh and the whole " you just dropped the Test match mate" but it actually reinforces the point he made, it was theatrical but it wasn't match fixing!!), so I would actually write about my experience of watching the greatest test match of the decade.
Day 1: Those were the days when I used to sit before TV at 8.30 when the match itself starts at 9am regardless of whether it was one day or test or whether India is batting or not, or India is leading the series or trailing it. Toss won by Steve Waugh and he decides to bat, and a small flicker of fear trickles its way into my mind...the last time India lost the toss at Eden Gardens was against South Africa and they lost that match comprehensively(though there was a gem from Azhar) and that gets reinforced when Slater and Hayden start brightly, with nothing in the pitch and a toothless pace attack(no offence to Khan and Prasad, but they were bad that day) I was having half a mind to go to college in the afternoon, with Hayden looking strong, and even though Slater got out, Langer was giving Hayden excellent company and at tea Aussies were truly on top.
I decided, I would go to my friend's place, as I couldn't watch any more and just as I was about to leave Hayden got out to an ill judged shot, and was caught at the deep. I decided to stay back, partly due to India getting a wicket, and also Mark Waugh was coming in to bat, and for the next 30 minutes it was like watching your lover dancing with somebody else(you can't stop watching her dance and admire it,but it still leaves a bitter taste in your mouth) as he was caressing the ball all over the park.
Probably the only person, who was actually saying India has a chance to get even with the Aussies now, was Ian Chappell who was constantly saying Bhajji was bowling well( I could'nt see any difference because Waugh and Langer were playing him easily) but Zaheer came back to dismiss Langer to have Steve Waugh at the crease and I was praying for a run out(another famous Steve quote- there is always a collapse after a run out), the collapse did happen and how!!!
Mark was beaten by a lowly straighter one from Bhajji with Mongia taking a good catch, and Ponting coming in(he was yet to become Harbhajan's bunny!!!) and also looking determined(later we would come to know that it was terror!!!) I wasnt looking for anything special but post tea sessions of any India-Aus tests, would become very significant, exciting, controversial in the coming years and it all started with this session.
Ponting was trapped in front by a straighter one again, and probably the controversial decision of the match-Gilchrist given out lbw the next ball,from round the wicket, though at first look, the ball did hit the back pad, believe it or not, my mom preparing coffee in the kitchen actually said,"Don't worry, Warne is going to get out and Bhajji is taking the hat-trick". Even before she finished the sentence, Ramesh had taken a blinder("probably his most significant contribution to Indian cricket") and the Aussies were on the ropes. Another moment I remember was Steve Waugh signalling for a helmet immediately after Warne got out, which gave me a small shiver,(Me being a Steve Waugh fan, would know the signs, Aussie on the back foot, only with tail enders for company you would not want him to start concentrating) and he was there till the end of the day with Gillespie.
Day 2: I have had many depressing cricketing days in my life, and this would probably be in the top 5. It was as if everything was going against India-umpires, pitch, luck, fate, and the Aussies sensing it were pounding them with pile drivers right in the centre. But this day, probably had what I believe the "Butterfly effect" moment of the match with umpire S.K.Bansal ruling Gillespie not out to a caught behind appeal that was so obvious that Gillespie was actually looking for the hammer to fall from the umpire!!! The moment the appeal was turned down, I knew that this wasn't gonna be our day, and I had a class to attend to in the morning, and we were going for a movie afterwards, so didnt know anything about the score(those were the Neandarthal days-pre cell phone, pre cricinfo) but we came back later to my friends place, where I was gleefully told the score that India's score was 110/7 and then I was asked a whole series of questions as to what the Indian players would be doing for the rest of the two days, will they tour Calcutta or will come to Chennai and hang in Marina Beach...some unparlimentary comments too which couldnt be typed in here.
One of them went as far to bet that if India took the match to the 4th day, he would do whatever I asked him to do!
Day 3- I didnt watch the match in the morning, because I left early, came to know that India was all out for 171(the first significant number of the match!!) and were following on. To be frank, at that moment, I had no idea about Headingley 81 and the heroics of Ian Botham, so was replaying all the other follow on situations in my mind and how likely India can salvage some pride...
We were in college sitting in class when one of the guys came very downcast saying Sachin was gone, and banged the bench so hard, that made us afraid if the lecturer next room could have heard it.
Then the class erupted in confusion...All because of the question -who is at the crease?
Ans: Laxman and Ganguly
Why did Ganguly promote himself to no.3? was the question doing the rounds when the guy clarified that Laxman had come to the crease at 3 and was playing quite well and that may be he will replace Dravid in the next match for the No.3 position, and how Dravid is going to have tough time to get back into the team.
At the end of the day, when I checked the scores I was a little happy, even though India may lose the match, I still have something to cheer about, I had won the bet!
Day 4: Left early again in the morning without switching on the TV, and absolutely didnt even think about it when around 12.30, while passing a group of guys, I heard that Laxman and Dravid were still at the crease. The first thought in my mind was, now this guy is kidding right? Asked them the score and was told that by lunch India were 376/4(376-the second significant number!!!). I dropped all pretense and rushed straight to my friend's home to watch the reminder of the "Rope-a-Dope"- Aussies unfamiliar with being counterattacked were wilting under the pressure, Waugh was looking grumpy, Mcgrath listless, and Warne as if he had no clue what was going on...and on the other hand, Laxman was painting a masterpiece, but wait a minute who was the other guy batting alongside him? This was probably the first match in which Dravid realised his potential when he stays positive in approach(it would pay rich dividends in the next match when he would play probably in my opinion his best innings!!!) The best example was the way he tackled Warne-while Lax was using his height to get to the pitch of the ball Dravid was dancing down the track when Warne came around the wicket. Laxman going past Gavaskar as the then highest scorer with an inside out cover drive, Dravid pointing his helmet at the press box after his century would forever be etched in my memory. All my thoughts for Day 5 were this- play till lunch and dont give the Aussies time and we should surely draw this match which is a fantastic achievement.
Day 5- One of my friends had some work to be done, and he didnt want to go at it alone,and called me, I couldnt say no, so went with him which took me most part of the morning and I came just after lunch at my friend's place to watch Hayden and Slater playing at the target of 384 runs.I was a little bit disappointed that Laxman couldnt get 300, and was horrified when Prasad dropped a regulation sitter of Slater.Slater isnt a slow poke and if Gilchrist comes at 3 and they stay there for 30 overs anything could happen, only for Slater to get out to Bhajji once again, and by this time we could see that Bhajji takes wickets in clusters and wasnt surprised when he got Langer top edging a sweep to short fine leg.
Raju got into the act with his only wicket(his last wicket in Test cricket!!) of the match, an absolute beauty to get Mark Waugh, and we watched in horror as Dravid dropped Steve Waugh at short leg of Bhajji("You just dropped the test match mate").
At tea, with Hayden and Waugh still batting, the only thought in my mind was, from here India can't lose, 18-0 wouldnt happen, and we have a great chance of levelling in Chennai, and the final frontier still stands(off course I didnt know at the moment that a draw would have given Aus the trophy!). But, the first day post tea session was a cracker, how would this one be?
Well, this one made that look like a benign lake! And the surprise factor was Sachin coming to pick 3 of the 7 wickets to fall! Waugh gone exactly the same way he was dropped, Badani taking the catch, Ponting to a stroke which would have all our friends ROTFL even now, Gilly to a perfect leg break, Warne to a beauty of a googly that even he would never bowl in his career, Hayden again to a similar shot of Gilly's LBW, but then Gillespie and Kasper delayed the impossible, and I saw the final Mcgrath wicket alone at my friend's house and for another 5 minutes was just staring in disbelief at what just happened....
In my opinion this would be the greatest test match of all in my life time and I can't imagine another to follow on its steps. But again...one cant't be sure what will happen while following on isnt it??
P.S- I asked my friend to run up and down the street he lived shouting Indian team is the best 3 times for losing the bet. Fair guy, he did it too!!!
Sunday, January 3, 2010
The death and the renaissance
The last decade could not have started on a worse note. The image of Hansie Cronje sitting in the press conference, in which he pleaded guilty of fixing matches in India, haunted me like hell for a long time. We thought that Cricket wouldn’t be the same again. And Cronje was not alone. Azhar was banned for life, Jadeja for 5 years, Salim Malik got a life ban after the Pakistan inquiry and Herschelle Gibbs narrowly escaped, courtesy India’s butter fingers. And accusations were flying here, there and everywhere. They said Akram, Lara, Stewart and who not? Infact SA as an entire team almost came close to tanking a match.
How could we watch another match without a suspicion? Almost every dropped catch from then on had a different connotation, a missed run out raised eye brows, a more curious case was when the batsman played a reckless shot and the fielder dropped the catch – are they both trying to tank it? Standing today it might appear like exaggeration but trust me these fears were true then. How about the past matches? Was the India vs Zim match fixed in the 1999 world cup? And the super six game against Australia in the same world cup? What about the match against Kenya at home that we lost? And that WI vs Kenya match in 1996 WC or the India vs SL semifinal in the same world cup? Hell, even the flip of a coin became a suspicious activity after Prabhakar’ revelation.
Sriram Dayanand wrote a masterful rant on Cricket’s crisis later in the decade with an apt title “Stop pissing in my coffee”. But the match fixing saga felt like someone choked my breath, forget pissing in my coffee. That emotional investment of over a decade seemed to go junk all at once. And since Cricket was such an integral part of my life, it lead to cynicism across other aspects of my life as well. Is there anything sacred in the world at all? Surely innocence is dead or so I thought then.
As we were grappling with the after effects of match fixing scandal in India, the Australian team under Steve Waugh was running roughshod over all comers, threatening to push off even that mighty West Indian team under Clive Lloyd from the pinnacle. Surely Australian public didn’t have a problem anywhere remotely close to their Indian counterpart. If anything they could only think that their players took money to over perform, such was their dominance during that time. And they were scheduled to come to India to conquer what Steve Waugh described as the last frontier.
“We promise to make it 18-0” said Waugh, standing at a 15-0 scoreline – is this cricket or tennis? A subset of that 15-0 scoreline was the 3-0 drubbing, they handed India down under a little over a year before. India after the 3-0 drubbing also lost their next home series 2-0 against the visiting South Africans (the match fixing tour) – the first series loss at home in close to 15 years. Then a scratchy victory against B’ladesh was followed by a 1-0 series victory over Zim at home. The form book of the two teams could not have been more contrasting.
With the match fixing saga still haunting, a struggling Indian team under a relatively new captain and without their greatest match winner to take on a rampaging Australian team was surely not a salivating prospect. But only if you undermine the Sachin effect that is. What if the innocence was dead the world over? Sachin was there for us – no one doubts the god. We knew he can still win us the series almost single-handedly, like he did the last time around in 1998 even without Kumble. So with that hope we switched on the TV sets and all the hope evaporated in no time, with yet another batting collapse, but there was the consolation of a little gem from Sachin though. But 176 against the world champions was way too short. Harbhajan nearly caused an Aussie collapse, well nearly, but Gilchrist took the game away from us with a whirlwind of an innings, which established a comfortable first innings lead for the Aussies.
Was there any more hope left? Hope there surely was, with Dravid and Sachin fighting every inch until for the umpteenth time Sachin got out in a dubious fashion pulling Mark Waugh which ricocheted off Langer’s shoulders at short leg for Ponting to complete a diving catch at mid-wicket. That was that. Unlike the mind games between Ganguly and Waugh before the series, there was only one winner on the field. Ruthless and clinical, the Aussies looked all set to fulfill their captain’s promise of making it 18-0.
By the time the bandwagon moved to Kolkata, we had almost given up hope but for a miracle nothing could save us. The Aussies piled on the runs in the first innings again despite a Harbhajan show with Steve Waugh scoring a hundred. In our turn the openers were back in the pavilion in no time and we looked upto Sachin again but it was not to be. For the first time, I saw Sachin being completely outfoxed by the opponent. Mcgrath had done his homework on Sachin perfectly this time. We could see him consciously shining the ball the moment Sachin came out to the crease. First ball, a sharp inswinger which Sachin just about manages to flick to square leg. Is that the cunning plan? A sharp inswinger to trap Sachin in front while playing his trademark flick? Oh it was and guess what, despite it being so obvious, Mcgrath still succeeded and trapped Sachin right in front. Switch off the TV man, forget Cricket, find something else to indulge, it’s simply not worth it – I was telling myself.
Switch off; I did only to switch it on a few minutes later! Laxman made an entertaining fifty and even the cheap pleasure of enjoying that while we were sliding down rather fast was denied by a bad umpiring decision. And with that we fell 74 runs still adrift of the follow on target. Steve Waugh was licking his lips, the final frontier appears to be a mere formality from here on, marches his bowlers to have one more crack at the Indian batsmen, enforcing the follow on without much of a hesitation. The script didn't change much in the second innings either even though Laxman and Dravid swapped places. Sachin failed in the second innings as well, a fighting partnership between Ganguly and Laxman seemed to delay the inevitable and Ganguly fell soon after as well. At 232 for 4, a guy who’s just been demoted to no.6 after a poor run, joins the guy who’s in the XI on borrowed time. They played out the rest of the day without any more damage. At least we would make them bat again, we thought at the end of the day.
Make them bat again? We did so much so that we could even dismiss them! Laxman and Dravid batted the entire day without giving a semblance of a real chance. That Dravid was overshadowed by Laxman is both sad and appropriate. Sad, because Dravid played out of his skin to prove his worth to the team, after facing a barrage of criticism post the Mumbai test. Appropriate, because for all the greatness of Dravid’s innings, Laxman was playing on a different planet. He didn’t look like getting out and nor he did have a problem in piercing the field as frequently as he wished. We have seen both Sachin and Lara at their best, but on this day, Laxman surpassed both of them. A bowling attack comprising of Mcgrath, Gillespie, Warne and Kasprowicz was made to look pedestrian so much so that Steve Waugh ended up using 9 bowlers in the innings. From the thoughts of making the Aussies bat again at the end of the third day, Laxman gave Ganguly a happy headache of deciding when to declare! Dramatic turnarounds, come from behind victories, back to the wall counter-attacking innings – we have seen them all before. But this day and this test surpassed all that we had seen in the past. The final day provided for the perfect finish to the test match with Harbhajan - with a fair bit of help from Sachin - ran through the Aussie batting line up in a little more than one session, to complete the mother of all come from behind victories.
This test match changed Indian Cricket forever. The match fixing row was a distant nightmare now, we are not a one man army any more, succumbing under pressure was not our cardinal trait and so on. Infact this was the foundation on which our test team was built, which has reached the pinnacle today. But of all its significances, the most important is that this test match buried the ghosts of match fixing completely. When Slater dropped Sachin’s catch in the next match at Chepauk, 'Pressure' was the word that came to mind and not any nexus with a bookie, when Indian batting collapsed once again in the fourth innings after Ramesh’s run-out, we rued our stupidity and lack of nerves and not lack of intent. It became a genuine world all over again or at least this test help successfully create that illusion which has been sustainable since then….
How could we watch another match without a suspicion? Almost every dropped catch from then on had a different connotation, a missed run out raised eye brows, a more curious case was when the batsman played a reckless shot and the fielder dropped the catch – are they both trying to tank it? Standing today it might appear like exaggeration but trust me these fears were true then. How about the past matches? Was the India vs Zim match fixed in the 1999 world cup? And the super six game against Australia in the same world cup? What about the match against Kenya at home that we lost? And that WI vs Kenya match in 1996 WC or the India vs SL semifinal in the same world cup? Hell, even the flip of a coin became a suspicious activity after Prabhakar’ revelation.
Sriram Dayanand wrote a masterful rant on Cricket’s crisis later in the decade with an apt title “Stop pissing in my coffee”. But the match fixing saga felt like someone choked my breath, forget pissing in my coffee. That emotional investment of over a decade seemed to go junk all at once. And since Cricket was such an integral part of my life, it lead to cynicism across other aspects of my life as well. Is there anything sacred in the world at all? Surely innocence is dead or so I thought then.
As we were grappling with the after effects of match fixing scandal in India, the Australian team under Steve Waugh was running roughshod over all comers, threatening to push off even that mighty West Indian team under Clive Lloyd from the pinnacle. Surely Australian public didn’t have a problem anywhere remotely close to their Indian counterpart. If anything they could only think that their players took money to over perform, such was their dominance during that time. And they were scheduled to come to India to conquer what Steve Waugh described as the last frontier.
“We promise to make it 18-0” said Waugh, standing at a 15-0 scoreline – is this cricket or tennis? A subset of that 15-0 scoreline was the 3-0 drubbing, they handed India down under a little over a year before. India after the 3-0 drubbing also lost their next home series 2-0 against the visiting South Africans (the match fixing tour) – the first series loss at home in close to 15 years. Then a scratchy victory against B’ladesh was followed by a 1-0 series victory over Zim at home. The form book of the two teams could not have been more contrasting.
With the match fixing saga still haunting, a struggling Indian team under a relatively new captain and without their greatest match winner to take on a rampaging Australian team was surely not a salivating prospect. But only if you undermine the Sachin effect that is. What if the innocence was dead the world over? Sachin was there for us – no one doubts the god. We knew he can still win us the series almost single-handedly, like he did the last time around in 1998 even without Kumble. So with that hope we switched on the TV sets and all the hope evaporated in no time, with yet another batting collapse, but there was the consolation of a little gem from Sachin though. But 176 against the world champions was way too short. Harbhajan nearly caused an Aussie collapse, well nearly, but Gilchrist took the game away from us with a whirlwind of an innings, which established a comfortable first innings lead for the Aussies.
Was there any more hope left? Hope there surely was, with Dravid and Sachin fighting every inch until for the umpteenth time Sachin got out in a dubious fashion pulling Mark Waugh which ricocheted off Langer’s shoulders at short leg for Ponting to complete a diving catch at mid-wicket. That was that. Unlike the mind games between Ganguly and Waugh before the series, there was only one winner on the field. Ruthless and clinical, the Aussies looked all set to fulfill their captain’s promise of making it 18-0.
By the time the bandwagon moved to Kolkata, we had almost given up hope but for a miracle nothing could save us. The Aussies piled on the runs in the first innings again despite a Harbhajan show with Steve Waugh scoring a hundred. In our turn the openers were back in the pavilion in no time and we looked upto Sachin again but it was not to be. For the first time, I saw Sachin being completely outfoxed by the opponent. Mcgrath had done his homework on Sachin perfectly this time. We could see him consciously shining the ball the moment Sachin came out to the crease. First ball, a sharp inswinger which Sachin just about manages to flick to square leg. Is that the cunning plan? A sharp inswinger to trap Sachin in front while playing his trademark flick? Oh it was and guess what, despite it being so obvious, Mcgrath still succeeded and trapped Sachin right in front. Switch off the TV man, forget Cricket, find something else to indulge, it’s simply not worth it – I was telling myself.
Switch off; I did only to switch it on a few minutes later! Laxman made an entertaining fifty and even the cheap pleasure of enjoying that while we were sliding down rather fast was denied by a bad umpiring decision. And with that we fell 74 runs still adrift of the follow on target. Steve Waugh was licking his lips, the final frontier appears to be a mere formality from here on, marches his bowlers to have one more crack at the Indian batsmen, enforcing the follow on without much of a hesitation. The script didn't change much in the second innings either even though Laxman and Dravid swapped places. Sachin failed in the second innings as well, a fighting partnership between Ganguly and Laxman seemed to delay the inevitable and Ganguly fell soon after as well. At 232 for 4, a guy who’s just been demoted to no.6 after a poor run, joins the guy who’s in the XI on borrowed time. They played out the rest of the day without any more damage. At least we would make them bat again, we thought at the end of the day.
Make them bat again? We did so much so that we could even dismiss them! Laxman and Dravid batted the entire day without giving a semblance of a real chance. That Dravid was overshadowed by Laxman is both sad and appropriate. Sad, because Dravid played out of his skin to prove his worth to the team, after facing a barrage of criticism post the Mumbai test. Appropriate, because for all the greatness of Dravid’s innings, Laxman was playing on a different planet. He didn’t look like getting out and nor he did have a problem in piercing the field as frequently as he wished. We have seen both Sachin and Lara at their best, but on this day, Laxman surpassed both of them. A bowling attack comprising of Mcgrath, Gillespie, Warne and Kasprowicz was made to look pedestrian so much so that Steve Waugh ended up using 9 bowlers in the innings. From the thoughts of making the Aussies bat again at the end of the third day, Laxman gave Ganguly a happy headache of deciding when to declare! Dramatic turnarounds, come from behind victories, back to the wall counter-attacking innings – we have seen them all before. But this day and this test surpassed all that we had seen in the past. The final day provided for the perfect finish to the test match with Harbhajan - with a fair bit of help from Sachin - ran through the Aussie batting line up in a little more than one session, to complete the mother of all come from behind victories.
This test match changed Indian Cricket forever. The match fixing row was a distant nightmare now, we are not a one man army any more, succumbing under pressure was not our cardinal trait and so on. Infact this was the foundation on which our test team was built, which has reached the pinnacle today. But of all its significances, the most important is that this test match buried the ghosts of match fixing completely. When Slater dropped Sachin’s catch in the next match at Chepauk, 'Pressure' was the word that came to mind and not any nexus with a bookie, when Indian batting collapsed once again in the fourth innings after Ramesh’s run-out, we rued our stupidity and lack of nerves and not lack of intent. It became a genuine world all over again or at least this test help successfully create that illusion which has been sustainable since then….
Decade in Review
“00-09 ten tumultuous years” says Cricinfo in its decade review – as apt as it is, it still feels like an understatement. The game has gone through such a metamorphosis that sometimes I wonder if it’s the same game that I fell in love with sometime in the early nineties. I know change is inevitable but a change of such monumental proportions and more importantly at such breakneck speed is hard to digest. This decade was what 90’s was for world financial markets, a decade of absolute excess. The game died a thousand deaths and had just as many renaissances! F1 executive thinks Cricket is giving their sport a run for their money and the God who bats at no.4 for India went onto become the all-time highest scorer in test cricket in front of a near empty stadium at home! Match-fixing, Sydney gate, IPL, Kolkata, Ashes, T-20 the decade had it all and some more. We can dedicate a month to review this decade and in all probability we would still fall short. And we also have to pick our customary Decade XI for both tests and ODI’s (Not yet for T-20s!). Hey…what about the cricketing awards for the decade? All this and a little more to follow in the next few posts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)