Let the objective observer take a walk...

At the end of the last post I admitted that Ponting deserves the title of “Player of the decade” if only we go by the records as a player and nothing else. But I also pointed out that personally I wouldn’t have gone for Ponting. Here’s why:

For a batsman of such class, he’s really struggled against certain bowlers – Harbhajan, Ishant Sharma and Kemar Roach are 3 top of the mind recalls. You can argue that Lara in bad form struggled against anyone who rolled his arm over but that’s only when he is not in form. Except for Mcgrath (that too to a limited extent) no particular bowler has really given Lara nightmares otherwise. But with Ponting you tend to witness that too often even when he is in form. Admittedly Ishant bowled a great spell in Perth but Ponting was absolutely clueless for such a sustained period and he was not going through a bad phase either. Even in the recent series against WI, Kemar Roach had his number all series. More than the dismissals against these bowlers, it’s the ungainly manner in which he played them through fairly long spells which puzzles me. Christian Ryan wrote of Ponting as the man who laughs at the bowlers’ faces (an expression initially used for Bradman!) but there have been enough bowlers who have more than reciprocated that laugh.

Another dark spot in his CV is his record in India. The irony is that he has a fairly good technique against spinners, uses his feet beautifully, handled Murali in Srilanka quite well but somehow comes a cropper in India. Out of his 15 innings in India this decade, his 3rd highest score is 24! An average of 21.85 in 8 matches is rather poor. That he finally scored a hundred in India was more due to a flat track in B’lore where even Zaheer Khan looked all at ease in saving the match than his overcoming of testing conditions. It seems like he suffers a brain freeze when playing in India – invents new ways of getting out. In the 2001 series, he looked like getting out off almost every delivery he faced. Against the most improved team of the decade which has given Australia many a close fight and in arguably the most testing place for a batsman, Ponting is yet to prove himself. True, one blot doesn’t make him undeserving of all the accolades he gets but did we acknowledge Dravid as an all time great till he overcame his demons in Australia?

Now let’s come to his captaincy – it’s a weird mix. He has been the most successful captain in the history of the game in tests and won two back to back ODI world cups too. He might have played his part in claiming the final frontier but it was under Gilchrist that Australia won both the matches at B’lore and Nagpur – so let’s leave that out of the picture. What about the 2 Ashes loss, his detractors might ask. I am not even getting there. Anyone who saw him in India in 2008 would vouch for the fact that his captaincy is rather ordinary, way too defensive and sometimes just incomprehensible – like bowling part timers to play within the spirit of the game when he had a chance to take the fight to India in Nagpur was hilarious. For a guy who spends an eternity between deliveries discussing with his bowlers, he could have found a million ways to play within the spirit of the game (i.e., assuming he actually cares about it!) than have part-timers bowling when the opposition is in a spot of bother! Just recollect any instance where an opponent looked like getting on top of Australia in the past, the next visual you can imagine is Ricky Ponting spreading the field and till as recently as last month he didn't really know that you can declare with less than a record target to chase in tests! So surely his captaincy shouldn’t have added any weight to his choice as player of the decade, if anything it should have had an adverse impact.

Now to my personal choice. Like I mentioned in my previous post, I would have gone for one of Dravid, Mcgrath or Gilchrist.

Glenn Mcgrath

Of course much of his career was in the 90’s but he was as good as ever in the noughties too. In a decade where 55 became the new 50 for batsmen, McGrath not only held his own but even improved on his record from the previous decade. He proved that a great fast bowler is capable of taking wickets in any conditions, situation and format. He was by far the most penetrative fast bowler in the sub-continent and delivered on big matches like only he can. For all the hype about Warne, its Mcgrath who helped Australia sustain their dominance for as long as they did. Against the two best batsmen of his generation, he held his own – infact some would argue he even got the better of one of them by a whisker. His stepping on that innocuous cherry in practice meant an Ashes loss for his country – that’s how critical he was to Australia’s success. His dismissal of Jacques Kallis in the 2007 WC was a masterful display of cunning bowling. But what takes the cake is his dismissal of Sachin Tendulkar in Kolkata in 2001. I have not seen anyone work out Sachin the way he did in that innings. Take a bow guys…arguably the most underrated of the all time great fast bowlers, finished off his test career with a 5-0 Ashes victory and ODI career with a man of the tournament capping WC victory.

Interestingly he seems to have been Sambit Bal’s pick too as he reveals in his blog.

Adam Gilchrist

Gilchrist changed the role of a wicketkeeper forever…I also believe he was Australia’s "go to" man in all almost all crunch situations and guess what, he invariably delivered. As a stand alone batsman he was nearly as great as any other modern great and as a wicket keeper, till the last season of his career, he was the best amongst the contemporaries too. He played some of the finest counter attacking innings in crisis by an Australian ever. He was equally deadly and effective in ODI cricket too with so many swashbuckling innings under his belt but none better than that masterpiece in the final of the 2007 WC – there is not a more definitive ODI innings ever. More than all that, Glichrist like Rhodes changed the way his community is meant to function forever. And that alone is reason enough to award him the player of the decade.

Rahul Dravid

It’s often said that Dravid in a Sachin obsessed country doesn’t get his due. Dravid went through a rather extended bad phase for a couple of seasosns towards the end of the decade after cruising through in top gear for more than 5 years in a row then. During that entire phase, not one prominent headline was there in a media known for hype over substance asking for Dravid’s head. We have even heard “Sachin should retire” or “Sachin should be rested” or “Endulkar?” slogans when he was going through a bad phase in the middle of the decade. But with Dravid we all knew, it was just a matter of time and if its not to be, then of all people he knows best when its time to call it quits. The fact that we have treated him with such maturity is proof enough that this man has got his rightful place in the hearts of cricket aficionados. This kind of matured adulation is not for no reason though. Has there been a batsman as critical to the success of a team ever as Dravid has been to India in this decade? Kolkata, Headingley, Adelaide, Rawalpindi, Perth, Jamaica – Dravid shone in so many of Indian cricket’s defining moments. Also in my opinion, he was India's best captain too. His cricketing acumen was impeccable, always game to take the gamble of a fifth bowler against an extra batsman, nurtured Dhoni into what he is today, brought greater flexibility and adaptiveness to the team. Has a series victory in WI and England under his belt in addition to the most number of consecutive successful run chases in ODI’s. Not to forget that he was the first victorious Indian Captain in Pakistan and South Africa. If a CV with so much to boast about is not fit for “Player of the decade”, then nothing is.