Sunday, February 14, 2010

There’s something about Eden

What’s it with Eden Gardens? The drama is almost inevitable for the theater not just demands but commands it. Trust me, it's not a retrospective romanticistion. Even as the South Africans were going hammer and tongs, as if they resumed from where they left in Nagpur, the buzz around the ground was unmistakable (that’s with less than half the capacity!). The same buzz which can make or break the home team. You can treat them as the 12th man when you are doing well and a whole gladiatorial crowd waiting for your execution when you are not. There’s no middle ground with the Eden Gardens crowd.

After a real thrashing in the hands of Peterson and Amla in the first 2 sessions, MSD & co came back with a lot more intent. It was Ishant’s short burst which really started it all. Amla not only looked as undismissable as he was in Nagpur but also looked more dangerous for he was scoring them at will and scoring them fast too. It took every ounce of energy from the off-colour Ishant to unsettle the assured Amla with some real good short stuff. Just when he looked to be overdoing the short pitched stuff, Dhoni handed the ball to Zaheer, who completed the job his partner had started – sent Amla packing with a short delivery which he duly edged to Dhoni. And a medley of the crowd, the buzz, the noise, a more penetrative Harbhajan, a moment of brain freeze from the monk and a little brilliance from Laxman on the field gave the most vital breakthrough. Then on…Eden just took over!

On the point that it's not a retrospective romanticisation – I had tweeted Aakash Chopra immediately after the fall of Hashim Amla: “@cricketaakash a tad romantic or is it real? y do I think a b'tng collapse looks more imminent in a stadium buzzin with ppl dan otherwise”. I was very serious when I said this. I really felt a batting collapse was imminent. The atmosphere created that sense. And in less then 10 min, I tweeted him again: “now I am convinced it is real :-)”.

As important as the pitches are, the audience at the stadium also makes it real hard for teams visiting India. But of late, dwindling attendance for tests have worked in visiting teams’ favor – an important challenge (since low turnout is taken for granted) is out of their way even before they step onto the field. Its such an irony that BCCI uses ad slots during a test series enticing people to come to the stadium to watch IPL (which already gets near full houses all the time), when the test itself is being played in a near empty stadium (I mean the Nagpur test). So much for BCCI’s priorities!

And did anyone notice any expression of regret or condolences for the bomb blast in Pune during the match? Not even the token expression of wearing a black arm-band? It’s a shame…

5 comments:

  1. I accept with your facts on Eden, there certainly is something at this ground which makes it very special.... But i dont accept the term "little brillance from laxman". It was just a catch which had to be taken at tat level and having dropped a sitter beofre, there is no big deal in that catch. The worst part is Sunny's commentry on that catch,this man's commentry is getting worse these days.

    I hate listening to Sunnys commntry, he keeps talking only about Sachin, Sachin, Sachin, Bhajji and few other Indian players. Some one should remind him that there is another team SA and its winning.

    No good commentators in world now.. Missing the days of Tony and Boycott :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. Boycott??? I am sorry. As bad as Sunny is, Boycott? Tony? - He is one of the most exciting for sure but good commentary? C'mon he goes so insane at times that he forgets the two teams playing on the field. I have seen him talk abt England and New Zealand in an India vs Zim Match! I agree with you on the point that there are lack of good commentators for most home matches but Boycott as an alternative is like choosing between devil and deep blue sea!

    Tony Cozier, Bill Lawry (till a couple of yrs back), Mark Taylor, Richie Benaud (even now),Sanjay Manjrekar, Mark Nicholas (till he joined channel 9), David Lloyd, Ian Chappell, Ian Bishop, even Nasser Hussain - there are so many good commentators going around but why pick Boycott of all!

    Laxman's catch was a damn good one. To a full-blooded sweep shot, the natural instincts of a slip fielder is to shout catch it and see if any one is coming around. For him to recover from the instincts,run back and take the catch over his shoulders was indeed a very good one.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Certainly Tony and Boycott were good commentators once... It was when they started to pair along side Sunny and Harsha they changed themselves. I accept Mark Tylor, Bill Lawruy, Benaud and Nicholas with you, they all are certainly good.. But they never come out of Australia :(

    ReplyDelete
  4. I can never accept Boycott as a good commentator. no never in my life. He is so self-centered for him to be a good commentator. Like Cheeka said once "Rascal, was not accepted his own country, comes and bitches about everything Indian and we fill up his bank account for that" - a very rough translation what Cheeka said in Tamil.

    Tony was exciting, very exciting - that's about it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Talking of good commentators, this is the most sane Indian commentator in a long time:

    http://www.espnstar.com/opinion/columnists/column/item242209/

    Its such an insightful piece. I hope Sports Illustrated take him on board soon. Or he starts writing directly on Cricnfo. I am not sure how many people even read espnstar columns these days.

    Also my piece on voice of Indian cricket:
    http://cricketnext.in.com/news/fanspeak-whos-the-voice-of-indian-cricket/40127-13-single.html

    ReplyDelete